[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1AE640813FDE7649BE1B193DEA596E883BBA4649@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 00:57:20 +0000
From: "Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@...el.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
CC: "Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>, Lv Zheng <zetalog@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 0/4] ACPI 2.0: Enable TermList interpretion for table
loading
Hi, Rafael
> From: rjwysocki@...il.com [mailto:rjwysocki@...il.com] On Behalf Of
> Rafael J. Wysocki
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] ACPI 2.0: Enable TermList interpretion for table
> loading
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:29 AM, Zheng, Lv <lv.zheng@...el.com> wrote:
> > Hi, Rafael
> >
> > Can we queue this up in linux-next?
> > ASLTS recursive tests are done in ACPICA upstream and no regressions can be
> seen.
> > We need more tests around this experimental change from the real users to
> have the chances to learn the unknown cases.
> > If they reported regressions, we could stop the regressions by reverting
> [PATCH 4/4].
> > So it should be safe to do such experiments in the Linux upstream.
> > Thanks in advance.
>
> There is a rule that during a merge window linux-next should only
> contain material for that merge window. That is, currently linux-next
> should only contain material targeted at v4.7.
>
> For this reason, I can't put the series into linux-next right now, but
> I'll do that as soon as 4.7-rc1 is released.
[Lv Zheng]
Great!
Thanks for the information.
Best regards
-Lv
Powered by blists - more mailing lists