linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.12 36/76] lpfc: fix misleading indentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <ba4d65ded3156a9b93f1de2904fcc88d6ddc7445.1463648873.git.jslaby@suse.cz>
Date:	Thu, 19 May 2016 11:07:58 +0200
From:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To:	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 3.12 36/76] lpfc: fix misleading indentation

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

3.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

===============

commit aeb6641f8ebdd61939f462a8255b316f9bfab707 upstream.

gcc-6 complains about the indentation of the lpfc_destroy_vport_work_array()
call in lpfc_online(), which clearly doesn't look right:

drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c: In function 'lpfc_online':
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c:2880:3: warning: statement is indented as if it were guarded by... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
   lpfc_destroy_vport_work_array(phba, vports);
   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c:2863:2: note: ...this 'if' clause, but it is not
  if (vports != NULL)
  ^~

Looking at the patch that introduced this code, it's clear that the
behavior is correct and the indentation is wrong.

This fixes the indentation and adds curly braces around the previous
if() block for clarity, as that is most likely what caused the code
to be misindented in the first place.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Fixes: 549e55cd2a1b ("[SCSI] lpfc 8.2.2 : Fix locking around HBA's port_list")
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt@....de>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
---
 drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
index 153de0cbfbc3..3b73eea72946 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
@@ -2697,7 +2697,7 @@ lpfc_online(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
 	}
 
 	vports = lpfc_create_vport_work_array(phba);
-	if (vports != NULL)
+	if (vports != NULL) {
 		for (i = 0; i <= phba->max_vports && vports[i] != NULL; i++) {
 			struct Scsi_Host *shost;
 			shost = lpfc_shost_from_vport(vports[i]);
@@ -2714,7 +2714,8 @@ lpfc_online(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
 			}
 			spin_unlock_irq(shost->host_lock);
 		}
-		lpfc_destroy_vport_work_array(phba, vports);
+	}
+	lpfc_destroy_vport_work_array(phba, vports);
 
 	lpfc_unblock_mgmt_io(phba);
 	return 0;
-- 
2.8.2