[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <573E205C.9080701@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 15:21:48 -0500
From: Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
To: Naveen Kaje <nkaje@...eaurora.org>,
Sricharan <sricharan@...eaurora.org>, wsa@...-dreams.de,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, rruigrok@...eaurora.org,
cov@...eaurora.org, austinwc@...eaurora.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] i2c: qup: support SMBus block read
Naveen Kaje wrote:
>>>
>>> + tags[len++] = QUP_TAG_V2_DATARD;
>>> + /* 0 implies 256 bytes */
>>> + if (data_len == QUP_READ_LIMIT)
>>> + tags[len++] = 0;
>>> + else
>>> + tags[len++] = data_len;
>>> + }
>> Even data_len will always be '1' right ?
> Yes, but here preferably we use a variable than a number without a context.
Actually, I would say the opposite. I would rather see a constant with
a comment explaining it, than a variable that we know will always
contain only one number.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum, a Linux Foundation collaborative project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists