[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1d96dfb6-9f0e-14ee-7f75-4c20fd98b183@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 15:16:49 -0600
From: Naveen Kaje <nkaje@...eaurora.org>
To: Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>,
Sricharan <sricharan@...eaurora.org>, wsa@...-dreams.de,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, rruigrok@...eaurora.org,
cov@...eaurora.org, austinwc@...eaurora.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] i2c: qup: support SMBus block read
Hi Timur, Sricharan,
On 5/19/2016 2:21 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Naveen Kaje wrote:
>>>>
>>>> + tags[len++] = QUP_TAG_V2_DATARD;
>>>> + /* 0 implies 256 bytes */
>>>> + if (data_len == QUP_READ_LIMIT)
>>>> + tags[len++] = 0;
>>>> + else
>>>> + tags[len++] = data_len;
>>>> + }
>>> Even data_len will always be '1' right ?
>> Yes, but here preferably we use a variable than a number without a
>> context.
>
> Actually, I would say the opposite. I would rather see a constant
> with a comment explaining it, than a variable that we know will always
> contain only one number.
>
Ok, got it. Will be fixed in V3.
Thanks,
Naveen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists