[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <573F9635.7080006@hpe.com>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 18:56:53 -0400
From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@....com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@....com>,
Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] locking/rwsem: Add reader-owned state to the owner
field
On 05/18/2016 09:37 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 08:20:24PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> Currently, it is not possible to determine for sure if a reader
>> owns a rwsem by looking at the content of the rwsem data structure.
>> This patch adds a new state RWSEM_READER_OWNED to the owner field
>> to indicate that readers currently own the lock.
> Oh, yes please. This will enable us to get rid of the remaining
> mrlock rwsem abstraction we've carried since the days of Irix in
> XFS. The only reason the abstraction still exists is that we track
> write locks for the purposes of checking for correct inode locking
> contexts via ASSERT(xfs_isilocked()) calls....
I think we could add code to export this read/write ownership
information. However, that will only work when both
CONFIG_RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM and CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER are set.
So this functionality may not be available in some architectures that
use CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK.
Cheers,
Longman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists