[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160524085343.GC8121@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 01:53:43 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Cc: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@...eyko.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Vyacheslav.Dubeyko@...t.com, Cyril.Guyot@...t.com,
Adam.Manzanares@...t.com, Damien.LeMoal@...t.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: introduce on-disk layout version checking
functionality
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 02:13:57PM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> As Christoph mentioned, how about checking the feature only like this?
>
> 1. if the feature is ON,
> - go 64 bits , when compiled w/ F2FS_MIN_16TB_VOLUME_SUPPORT
> - fail to mount, when compiled w/o F2FS_MIN_16TB_VOLUME_SUPPORT
>
> 2. if the feature is OFF,
> - fail to mount, when compiled w/ F2FS_MIN_16TB_VOLUME_SUPPORT
> - go 32 bits , when compiled w/o F2FS_MIN_16TB_VOLUME_SUPPORT
>
> Thoughts?
That goes on to the next question: why do we even need a config option
for 16TB+ volume support?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists