linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: fix possible css ref leak on oom

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 24 May 2016 11:22:02 +0200
From:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...tuozzo.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: fix possible css ref leak on oom

On Tue 24-05-16 12:01:42, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:47:37AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 24-05-16 11:43:19, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 07:44:43PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > On Mon 23-05-16 19:02:10, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> > > > > mem_cgroup_oom may be invoked multiple times while a process is handling
> > > > > a page fault, in which case current->memcg_in_oom will be overwritten
> > > > > leaking the previously taken css reference.
> > > > 
> > > > Have you seen this happening? I was under impression that the page fault
> > > > paths that have oom enabled will not retry allocations.
> > > 
> > > filemap_fault will, for readahead.
> > 
> > I thought that the readahead is __GFP_NORETRY so we do not trigger OOM
> > killer.
> 
> Hmm, interesting. We do allocate readahead pages with __GFP_NORETRY, but
> we add them to page cache and hence charge with GFP_KERNEL or GFP_NOFS
> mask, see __do_page_cache_readahaed -> read_pages.

I guess we do not want to trigger OOM just because of readahead. What do
you think about the following? I will cook up a full patch if this
(untested) looks ok.
---
diff --git a/include/linux/pagemap.h b/include/linux/pagemap.h
index 97354102794d..81363b834900 100644
--- a/include/linux/pagemap.h
+++ b/include/linux/pagemap.h
@@ -209,10 +209,10 @@ static inline struct page *page_cache_alloc_cold(struct address_space *x)
 	return __page_cache_alloc(mapping_gfp_mask(x)|__GFP_COLD);
 }
 
-static inline struct page *page_cache_alloc_readahead(struct address_space *x)
+static inline gfp_t readahead_gfp_mask(struct address_space *x)
 {
-	return __page_cache_alloc(mapping_gfp_mask(x) |
-				  __GFP_COLD | __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOWARN);
+	return mapping_gfp_mask(x) |
+				  __GFP_COLD | __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOWARN;
 }
 
 typedef int filler_t(void *, struct page *);
diff --git a/mm/readahead.c b/mm/readahead.c
index 40be3ae0afe3..7431fefe4ede 100644
--- a/mm/readahead.c
+++ b/mm/readahead.c
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ int read_cache_pages(struct address_space *mapping, struct list_head *pages,
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(read_cache_pages);
 
 static int read_pages(struct address_space *mapping, struct file *filp,
-		struct list_head *pages, unsigned nr_pages)
+		struct list_head *pages, unsigned nr_pages, gfp_t gfp_mask)
 {
 	struct blk_plug plug;
 	unsigned page_idx;
@@ -126,8 +126,7 @@ static int read_pages(struct address_space *mapping, struct file *filp,
 	for (page_idx = 0; page_idx < nr_pages; page_idx++) {
 		struct page *page = lru_to_page(pages);
 		list_del(&page->lru);
-		if (!add_to_page_cache_lru(page, mapping, page->index,
-				mapping_gfp_constraint(mapping, GFP_KERNEL))) {
+		if (!add_to_page_cache_lru(page, mapping, page->index, gfp_mask)) {
 			mapping->a_ops->readpage(filp, page);
 		}
 		put_page(page);
@@ -159,6 +158,7 @@ int __do_page_cache_readahead(struct address_space *mapping, struct file *filp,
 	int page_idx;
 	int ret = 0;
 	loff_t isize = i_size_read(inode);
+	gfp_t gfp_mask = readahead_gfp_mask(mapping);
 
 	if (isize == 0)
 		goto out;
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ int __do_page_cache_readahead(struct address_space *mapping, struct file *filp,
 		if (page && !radix_tree_exceptional_entry(page))
 			continue;
 
-		page = page_cache_alloc_readahead(mapping);
+		page = __page_cache_alloc(gfp_mask);
 		if (!page)
 			break;
 		page->index = page_offset;
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ int __do_page_cache_readahead(struct address_space *mapping, struct file *filp,
 	 * will then handle the error.
 	 */
 	if (ret)
-		read_pages(mapping, filp, &page_pool, ret);
+		read_pages(mapping, filp, &page_pool, ret, gfp_mask);
 	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&page_pool));
 out:
 	return ret;

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs