lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1605241223460.31937@cbobk.fhfr.pm> Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 12:24:47 +0200 (CEST) From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org> To: "Fu, Zhonghui" <zhonghui.fu@...ux.intel.com> cc: benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com, dtor@...omium.org, bleung@...omium.org, Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>, aduggan@...aptics.com, k.kozlowski@...sung.com, dianders@...omium.org, gabriele.mzt@...il.com, linux-input@...r.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c_hid: enable i2c-hid devices to suspend/resume asynchronously On Thu, 19 May 2016, Fu, Zhonghui wrote: > i2c-hid devices' suspend/resume are usually time-consuming process. > For example, the touch controller(i2c-ATML1000:00) on ASUS T100 tablet > takes about 160ms for suspending and 120ms for resuming. This patch > enables i2c-hid devices to suspend/resume asynchronously. This will > take advantage of multicore and speed up system suspend/resume process. Umm, why do we need this in the first place, given the fact that we are enabling async suspend for each and every HID device allocated via hid_allocate_device() already? -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists