| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20160524025356.GA6675@shlinux2>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 10:53:56 +0800
From: Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@...il.com>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
Cc: Jun Li <jun.li@....com>,
"peter.chen@...escale.com" <peter.chen@...escale.com>,
"balbi@...nel.org" <balbi@...nel.org>,
"tony@...mide.com" <tony@...mide.com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"dan.j.williams@...el.com" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com" <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
"Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com" <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
"sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com"
<sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
"jun.li@...escale.com" <jun.li@...escale.com>,
"grygorii.strashko@...com" <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
"yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com" <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
"robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
"nsekhar@...com" <nsekhar@...com>, "b-liu@...com" <b-liu@...com>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 13/14] usb: gadget: udc: adapt to OTG core
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 01:36:51PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> On 23/05/16 13:34, Jun Li wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Roger Quadros [mailto:rogerq@...com]
> >> Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 6:12 PM
> >> To: Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@...il.com>
> >> Cc: Jun Li <jun.li@....com>; peter.chen@...escale.com; balbi@...nel.org;
> >> tony@...mide.com; gregkh@...uxfoundation.org; dan.j.williams@...el.com;
> >> mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com; Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com;
> >> sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com; jun.li@...escale.com;
> >> grygorii.strashko@...com; yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com;
> >> robh@...nel.org; nsekhar@...com; b-liu@...com; linux-usb@...r.kernel.org;
> >> linux-omap@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> >> devicetree@...r.kernel.org
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 13/14] usb: gadget: udc: adapt to OTG core
> >>
> >> On 23/05/16 06:21, Peter Chen wrote:
> >>> On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 10:29:40AM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> >>>> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 10:32:44AM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >>>>> On 18/05/16 17:46, Jun Li wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I didn't want to have complex Kconfig so decided to have otg as
> >>>>>>>>> built-in only.
> >>>>>>>>> What do you want me to change in existing code? and why?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Remove those stuff which only for pass diff driver config Like
> >>>>>>>> every controller driver need a duplicated
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> static struct otg_hcd_ops ci_hcd_ops = {
> >>>>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This is an exception only. Every controller driver doesn't need to
> >>>>>>> implement hcd_ops. It is implemented in the hcd core.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> And here is another example, for gadget connect, otg driver can
> >>>>>>>> directly call to usb_udc_vbus_handler() in drd state machine, but
> >>>>>>>> you create another interface:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> .connect_control = usb_gadget_connect_control,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> If the symbol is defined in one driver which is 'm', another
> >>>>>>>> driver reference it should be 'm' as well, then there is no this
> >>>>>>>> kind of problem as my understanding.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> That is fine as long as all are 'm'. but how do you solve the case
> >>>>>>> when Gadget is built in and host is 'm'? OTG has to be built-in
> >>>>>>> and you will need an hcd to gadget interface.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hcd to gadget interface? Or you want to say otg to host interface?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Sorry, I meant to say host to otg interface.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I think hcd and gadget are independent each other, now
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hcd --> otg; and gadget --> otg, (hcd and gadget use otg's symbol)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It is actually a circular dependency for both.
> >>>>> hcd <--> otg and gadget <--> otg
> >>>>>
> >>>>> hcd -> otg for usb_otg_register/unregister_hcd otg -> hcd for
> >>>>> usb_add/remove_hcd, usb_bus_start_enum, usb_control_msg,
> >>>>> usb_hub_find_child
> >>>>>
> >>>>> gadget -> otg for usb_otg_register/unregister_gadget
> >>>>> otg -> gadget for usb_gadget_start/stop, usb_udc_vbus_handler
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Now consider what will happen if I get rid of the otg_hcd and
> >> otg_gadget interfaces.
> >>>>> 'y' means built-in, 'm' means module.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 1) hcd 'y', gadget 'y'
> >>>>> otg has to be 'y' for proper build.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2) hcd 'm', gadget 'm'
> >>>>> otg has to be 'm' for proper build.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 3) hcd 'y', gadget 'm'
> >>>>> Build will fail always.
> >>>>> If otg is 'y', otg build will fail due to dependency on gadget.
> >>>>> If otg is 'm', hcd build will fail due to dependency on otg.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 4) hcd 'm', gadget 'y'
> >>>>> Build will fail always.
> >>>>> If otg is 'y', otg build will fail due to dependency on hcd.
> >>>>> If otg is 'm', gadget build will fails due to dependency on otg.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So I solve this problem by adding the otg_hcd_ops and otg_gadget_ops
> >>>>> to remove otg->hcd and otg->gadget dependency.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Now we can address 3) and 4) like so
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 3) hcd 'y', gadget 'm'
> >>>>> otg has to be 'y' for proper build.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 4) hcd 'm', gadget 'y'
> >>>>> otg has to be 'y' for proper build.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> How about this:
> >>>> Moving usb_otg_register/unregister_hcd to host driver to remove
> >>>> dependency hcd->otg. And moving usb_otg_get_data to common.c.
> >>>>
> >>>> Delete the wait queue at usb-otg.c, and if calling usb_otg_get_data
> >>>> returns NULL, the host/device driver's probe return -EPROBE_DEFER.
> >>>> When the otg driver is probed successfully, the host/device will be
> >>>> re-probed again, and usb_otg_register_hcd will be called again.
> >>>>
> >>>> And let OTG depends on HCD && GADGET, and delete otg_hcd_ops and
> >>>> otg_gadget_ops. Below build dependency issues can be fixed.
> >>>> What do you think?
> >>>>
> >>>>> 1) hcd 'y', gadget 'y'
> >>>>> otg has to be 'y' for proper build.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2) hcd 'm', gadget 'm'
> >>>>> otg has to be 'm' for proper build.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 3) hcd 'y', gadget 'm'
> >>>>> Build will fail always.
> >>>>> If otg is 'y', otg build will fail due to dependency on gadget.
> >>>>> If otg is 'm', hcd build will fail due to dependency on otg.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 4) hcd 'm', gadget 'y'
> >>>>> Build will fail always.
> >>>>> If otg is 'y', otg build will fail due to dependency on hcd.
> >>>>> If otg is 'm', gadget build will fails due to dependency on otg.
> >>>> --
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> After thinking more, my suggestion can't work. How about moving
> >>> CONFIG_USB_OTG out of CONFIG_USB, in that case, CONFIG_USB_OTG can
> >>> only be built in.
> >>>
> >> I tried this but it still doesn't resolve 3 and 4. I.e.
> >> it can't be automatically set to 'y' when either of hcd/gadget is 'y'
> >> and the other is 'm'.
> >
> > USB_OTG only can be selected by *user*, can't be automatically set to
> > 'y' like you said, no matter what's hcd/gadget config, USB_OTG can be
> > disabled in any cases.
>
> Yes. I am on the same page with that.
> >
> > I think Peter's intention is to make USB_OTG to be 'bool', either disabled;
> > or built-in(if enabled), something like your original idea?
>
> I'm fine with my original idea if you guys can confirm :).
>
Please do it.
--
Best Regards,
Peter Chen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists