linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: fix setting AP channel with new firmwares

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACna6rxYaOtdjGwVenhz66khNMdpqvnbZWfNupBwtp13hbXfBg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 25 May 2016 23:49:42 +0200
From:	Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
To:	Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>
Cc:	Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
	Brett Rudley <brudley@...adcom.com>,
	Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>,
	"Franky (Zhenhui) Lin" <frankyl@...adcom.com>,
	Hante Meuleman <meuleman@...adcom.com>,
	Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieterpg@...adcom.com>,
	"open list:BROADCOM BRCM80211 IEEE802.11n WIRELESS DRIVER" 
	<linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	"open list:BROADCOM BRCM80211 IEEE802.11n WIRELESS DRIVER" 
	<brcm80211-dev-list@...adcom.com>,
	"open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: fix setting AP channel with new firmwares

On 25 May 2016 at 23:08, Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com> wrote:
> On 24-05-16 11:09, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> Firmware for new chipsets is based on a new major version of code
>> internally maintained at Broadcom. E.g. brcmfmac4366b-pcie.bin (used for
>> BCM4366B1) is based on 10.10.69.3309 while brcmfmac43602-pcie.ap.bin was
>> based on 7.35.177.56.
>>
>> Currently setting AP 5 GHz channel doesn't work reliably with BCM4366B1.
>> When setting e.g. 36 control channel with VHT80 (center channel 42)
>> firmware may randomly pick one of:
>> 1) 52 control channel with 58 as center one
>> 2) 100 control channel with 106 as center one
>> 3) 116 control channel with 122 as center one
>> 4) 149 control channel with 155 as center one
>>
>> It seems new firmwares require setting AP mode (BRCMF_C_SET_AP) before
>> specifying a channel. Changing an order of firmware calls fixes the
>> problem.
>>
>> This fix was verified with BCM4366B1 and tested for regressions on
>> BCM43602. It's unclear if it's needed (or correct at all) for P2P
>> interfaces so it leaves this code unaffected.
>
> In doing so the code reads a bit awkward so if P2P-GO works with the
> changed order that would be preferable.

I'd prefer to have one code path as well, but my device/firmware
doesn't support P2P so I couldn't test it.

Could you test it or check firmware code to see if it's safe to change
P2P path as well?

-- 
Rafał