linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] xfs: updates for 4.7-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFydXfyKUiCA7FEXOhPuoQJrAMY+K-U+n7iGaKHSCYHFSA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 26 May 2016 10:19:13 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] xfs: updates for 4.7-rc1

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:13 PM, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com> wrote:
>
> Just yell if this is not OK and I'll drop those branches for this
> merge and resend the pull request....

i'm ok with the late branches, it's not like xfs has been a problem spot.

However:

> are available in the git repository at:
>
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dgc/linux-xfs.git for-next

Your pull request mentions the 'for-next' branch, but I think you
*meant* to send me the "xfs-for-linus-4.7-rc1" tag which points to the
same commit and has your summary in it.

Please try to make sure your pull requests actually contain what you
intend for them to do,

               Linus