[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAtXAHdxPy5mMjA+9tqjWDYqgpHcycohJHaESwqSE8xd6L4FrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 10:28:48 -0700
From: Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@...us.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"pawel.moll@....com" <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] doc: bindings: Add bindings documentation for mtd
otp nvmem
Hi Boris,
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Boris Brezillon
<boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> I think the MTD partition -> nvmem connection could benefit to non-OTP
> partitions too.
Yeah, I thought about that, too. Would you use the _read, and _write
callbacks in that case?
> So, how about defining the nvmem regions under the partition nodes,
> like that:
>
> flash@0 {
> partitions {
> compatible = "fixed-partitions";
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <1>;
>
> partition@0 {
> label = "uboot-spl";
> reg = <0x0 0xe0000>;
> };
>
> /* ... */
>
> partition@X{
> label = "factory-data-part";
> reg = <0x200000 0x100000>;
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <1>;
>
> product: nvmem@0 {
> reg = <0x0 0x2>;
> };
>
> revision: nvmem@3 {
> reg = <0x3 0x2>;
> };
> };
> };
>
> otp-partitions {
> compatible = "fixed-partitions";
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <1>;
>
> partition@X{
> label = "factory-data-part";
> reg = <0x0 0x40>;
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <1>;
>
> product: nvmem@0 {
> reg = <0x0 0x2>;
> };
>
> revision: nvmem@3 {
> reg = <0x3 0x2>;
> };
> };
> };
> };
>
> I know this requires changing the implementation to select the
> appropriate nvmem wrapper to use depending on whether we're interfacing
> with an OTP area or a regular one, but that should be doable.
The implementation still needs work anyways, so I might as well add
this to my list ...
Would you do the nvmem mapping always, or conditionalize on a flag in
the dt node like 'nvmem-export'?
Thanks for the feedback,
Moritz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists