linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] soc: Add SoC driver for Freescale Vybrid platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9495361.v6aft1QR0M@wuerfel>
Date:	Fri, 27 May 2016 10:31:55 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	maitysanchayan@...il.com
Cc:	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
	Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] soc: Add SoC driver for Freescale Vybrid platform

On Friday, May 27, 2016 12:03:01 PM CEST maitysanchayan@...il.com wrote:
> 
> So if I understand correctly, the binding at the SoC level is fine.
> Keeping that but removing the additional made-up properties, viz. below
> 
> rom-revision: phandle to the on-chip ROM node
> mscm: phandle to the MSCM CPU configuration node
> nvmem-cells: phandles to two OCOTP child nodes ocotp_cfg0 and ocotp_cfg1
> nvmem-cell-names: should contain string names "cfg0" and "cfg1"
> 
> would be fine?
> 
> We would have something similar to here
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg80655.html
> 
> but now with the DT binding under SoC bus.
> 


You look up the OTP device as a syscon here, which seems odd since there
is already an nvmem driver for it. Shouldn't you use the nvmem API for
that?

	Arnd