[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160527100817.GA8294@Sanchayan-Arch.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 15:38:17 +0530
From: maitysanchayan@...il.com
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] soc: Add SoC driver for Freescale Vybrid platform
On 16-05-27 10:31:55, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday, May 27, 2016 12:03:01 PM CEST maitysanchayan@...il.com wrote:
> >
> > So if I understand correctly, the binding at the SoC level is fine.
> > Keeping that but removing the additional made-up properties, viz. below
> >
> > rom-revision: phandle to the on-chip ROM node
> > mscm: phandle to the MSCM CPU configuration node
> > nvmem-cells: phandles to two OCOTP child nodes ocotp_cfg0 and ocotp_cfg1
> > nvmem-cell-names: should contain string names "cfg0" and "cfg1"
> >
> > would be fine?
> >
> > We would have something similar to here
> > http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg80655.html
> >
> > but now with the DT binding under SoC bus.
> >
>
>
> You look up the OTP device as a syscon here, which seems odd since there
> is already an nvmem driver for it. Shouldn't you use the nvmem API for
> that?
>
> Arnd
I need the following
nvmem-cells: phandles to two OCOTP child nodes ocotp_cfg0 and ocotp_cfg1
nvmem-cell-names: should contain string names "cfg0" and "cfg1"
to be able to use the NVMEM consumer API.
If I can put them at SoC node level then I certainly can use the NVMEM API.
Regards,
Sanchayan.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists