[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1464312955.16344.55.camel@perches.com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 18:35:55 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use the correct size to set block max sectors
dOn Thu, 2016-05-26 at 17:08 -0700, Long Li wrote:
> The block sector size should be in unit of 512 bytes, not in bytes.
Thanks. The patch subject should use something like:
[PATCH] sd: Use the correct size to set block max sectors
to show what subsystem is being modified.
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
[]
> @@ -2862,9 +2862,11 @@ static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
> if (sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks &&
> sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks <= dev_max &&
> sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks <= SD_DEF_XFER_BLOCKS &&
> - sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks * sdp->sector_size >= PAGE_SIZE)
> - rw_max = q->limits.io_opt =
> + sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks * sdp->sector_size >= PAGE_SIZE) {
> + q->limits.io_opt =
> sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks * sdp->sector_size;
> + rw_max = (q->limits.io_opt >> 9);
> + }
> else
> rw_max = BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS;
And style trivia: it'd be more kernel style consistent as:
if (...
sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks * sdp->sector_size >= PAGE_SIZE) {
q->limits.io_opt = sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks * sdp->sector_size;
rw_max = q->limits.io_opt >> 9;
} else {
rw_max = BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS;
}
ie: no parentheses necessary around the shifted value and
braces around both arms.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists