[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aad00979-740e-b844-64fb-4bfa646796e5@sandisk.com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 19:18:35 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>
To: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use the correct size to set block max sectors
On 05/26/16 17:08, Long Li wrote:
> The block sector size should be in unit of 512 bytes, not in bytes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/sd.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> index 428c03e..4bce17e 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> @@ -2862,9 +2862,11 @@ static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
> if (sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks &&
> sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks <= dev_max &&
> sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks <= SD_DEF_XFER_BLOCKS &&
> - sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks * sdp->sector_size >= PAGE_SIZE)
> - rw_max = q->limits.io_opt =
> + sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks * sdp->sector_size >= PAGE_SIZE) {
> + q->limits.io_opt =
> sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks * sdp->sector_size;
> + rw_max = (q->limits.io_opt >> 9);
> + }
> else
> rw_max = BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS;
Isn't this a duplicate of a patch Martin Petersen posted three weeks
ago? See also http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.scsi/113746.
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists