[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <574A063D.5030700@weinigel.se>
Date: Sat, 28 May 2016 22:57:33 +0200
From: Christer Weinigel <christer@...nigel.se>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] devicetree - document using aliases to set spi bus
number.
On 05/27/2016 08:36 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> Personally the way I parse this situation is that the kernel is taking
> a look at what's in the DT and making an effort to present it usefully
> in the running systems. Fixing our current interpretation in stone as
> a supported thing when we don't have to makes it more cumbersome to
> improve and discourages any efforts to do similar things in the
> future. It is reasonable to provide and document something here but
> when there's some fairly simple and obvious better things we could be
> doing it should be those rather than the legacy stuff.
So what are the "simple and obvious better things" that one can use instead?
/Christer
--
Have laptop, will travel. I'm a consultant looking for interesting
jobs anywhere in the world. I'm an experienced software engineer with
a solid understanding of hardware. Specialities: Linux, device
drivers and embedded systems in general. Find me at www.weinigel.se.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists