[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160530161350.GR29837@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 17:13:50 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Christer Weinigel <christer@...nigel.se>
Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] devicetree - document using aliases to set spi bus
number.
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 10:57:33PM +0200, Christer Weinigel wrote:
> On 05/27/2016 08:36 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > It is reasonable to provide and document something here but when there's
> > some fairly simple and obvious better things we could be doing it should
> > be those rather than the legacy stuff.
> So what are the "simple and obvious better things" that one can use instead?
To repeat what Rob said adding a label property on the leaf device
nodes seems like a more sensible option.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists