[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160530161020.GC11853@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 13:10:20 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Hemant Kumar <hemant@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Brendan Gregg <brendan.d.gregg@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH perf/core v9 00/16] perf-probe --cache and SDT support
Em Mon, May 30, 2016 at 12:54:58PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> Hi Masami,
>
> On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 12:15:01AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here is the 9th version of the patchset for probe-cache and
> > initial SDT support.
> >
> > The previous version is here; https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/14/107
> >
> > This version just fixes 2 points according to Hemant's comment,
> > and split out the filename__readable() patch.
> >
> > Changes in v9:
> > - [1/16,2/16] split out the filename__readable()
> > - [7/16] Fix to show which event is deleted.
> > - [12/16] Update list_usage to show sdt option.
> >
> > Thank you,
>
> Thanks for doing this, I hope this gets merged soon. The patch 4 and
> 14 look a bit larger and would be better to be splitted IMHO. Other
> than that, all look good to me.
>
> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Agreed, please split both patches, I applied 1-3, please resend from 4
onwards.
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists