linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Rework clk/vt8500 wm8650_find_pll

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 31 May 2016 09:23:29 +0300
From:	Roman Volkov <v1ron@...l.ru>
To:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	Roman Volkov <rvolkov@...os.org>,
	Tony Prisk <linux@...sktech.co.nz>,
	Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Rework clk/vt8500 wm8650_find_pll_bits()

В Tue, 24 May 2016 23:07:51 +0300
Roman Volkov <v1ron@...l.ru> пишет:

> From: Roman Volkov <rvolkov@...os.org>
> 
> Hi Arnd and others,
> 
> This patch finally removes the warnings from GCC about possibly
> uninitialized variables 'best_div2', 'best_div1', and 'best_mul'.
> Also one of the functions is reworked, so that the algorithm is much
> easier. This is to continue the work started in [1].
> 
> This code is tested on WM8650. Also the testing app was used in
> user-mode to check possible values and performance [2].
> 
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/1/149
> [2] https://github.com/v1ron/vt8500-clkrange
> 
> Thanks,
> Roman Volkov (2):
>   clk/vt8500: Rework wm8650_find_pll_bits()
>   clk/vt8500: Fix compilation warnings
> 
>  drivers/clk/clk-vt8500.c | 81
> +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- 1 file changed, 39
> insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
> 

Hi Stephen,

Do we need this change during this merge window?

Thanks,
Roman