linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] clk: sunxi: predivider handling for factors clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160531103905.faf5e2b80d60d46c8757ad1c@free.fr>
Date:	Tue, 31 May 2016 10:39:05 +0200
From:	Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@...e.fr>
To:	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:	Vishnu Patekar <vishnupatekar0510@...il.com>, emilio@...pez.com.ar,
	sboyd@...eaurora.org, wens@...e.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] clk: sunxi: predivider handling for factors clock

On Mon, 30 May 2016 20:45:32 +0200
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> wrote:

> I went over all the A83T clocks, and most of them could be
> covered. The issue only lies in the PLLs and their additional 1-bit
> dividers.
> 
> If we just choos to ignore (one of) them, it should be pretty trivial
> to implement with the current clock classes we have.

Hi Maxime,

I already did the job for all the A83T clocks.
It is not fully tested yet, but, to be sure we are on the same way,
I am sending a RFC series.

-- 
Ken ar c'hentañ	|	      ** Breizh ha Linux atav! **
Jef		|		http://moinejf.free.fr/