linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] clk: sunxi: predivider handling for factors clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 31 May 2016 10:59:15 +0200
From:	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@...e.fr>
Cc:	Vishnu Patekar <vishnupatekar0510@...il.com>, emilio@...pez.com.ar,
	sboyd@...eaurora.org, wens@...e.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] clk: sunxi: predivider handling for factors clock

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:39:05AM +0200, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> On Mon, 30 May 2016 20:45:32 +0200
> Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> 
> > I went over all the A83T clocks, and most of them could be
> > covered. The issue only lies in the PLLs and their additional 1-bit
> > dividers.
> > 
> > If we just choos to ignore (one of) them, it should be pretty trivial
> > to implement with the current clock classes we have.
> 
> Hi Maxime,
> 
> I already did the job for all the A83T clocks.
> It is not fully tested yet, but, to be sure we are on the same way,
> I am sending a RFC series.

Awesome, thanks!

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)