[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZkz+nKVzboKc9YdhQe9Mmj7UCwdwdeRTfhsRePxN3pzw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 10:58:28 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/17] pinctrl: copy per-pin driver private data to struct pin_desc
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
> Currently, struct pinctrl_pin_desc can have per-pin driver private
> data, but it is not copied to struct pin_desc.
>
> For a driver with sparse pin space, for-loop search like below would
> be necessary in order to get the driver-specific data for a desired
> pin number.
>
> for (i = 0; i < pctldev->desc->npins; i++)
> if (pin_number == pctldev->desc->pins[i].number)
> return pctldev->desc->pins[i].drv_data;
>
> This is not efficient for a driver with a large number of pins.
> So, copy the data to struct pin_desc when each pin is registered
> for the faster radix tree lookup.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
> ---
> This is a re-sent of
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/626015/
>
> I included it again in this series because it is a prerequisite
> of 9/17. Otherwise, the kbuild test robot might start
> complaining about the build error.
OK already applied.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists