[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaOzZ1DvEUKtomBU=GH1kYfjKJjUfM-=45PhdzZA=dPgg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 10:41:49 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, x86@...nel.org,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] gpio: Allow PC/104 devices on X86_64
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 12:08 AM, William Breathitt Gray
<vilhelm.gray@...il.com> wrote:
> With the introduction of the ISA_BUS_API Kconfig option, ISA-style
> drivers may be built for X86_64 architectures. This patch changes the
> ISA Kconfig option dependency of the PC/104 drivers to ISA_BUS_API, thus
> allowing them to build for X86_64 as they are expected to.
>
> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> Signed-off-by: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Or should I apply this directly to the GPIO tree?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists