[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160531013132.GQ18670@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 09:31:32 +0800
From: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
umgwanakikbuti@...il.com, bsegall@...gle.com, pjt@...gle.com,
morten.rasmussen@....com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] sched: Clean up SD_BALANCE_WAKE flags in sched
domain build-up
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:21:46AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:11:37AM +0800, Yuyang Du wrote:
> > The SD_BALANCE_WAKE is irrelevant in the contexts of these two removals,
> > and in addition SD_BALANCE_WAKE is not and should not be set in any
> > sched_domain flags so far.
>
> This Changelog doesn't make any sense...
How? SD_BALANCE_WAKE is not in any sched_domain flags (sd->flags), even if
it is, it is not used anywhere, no?
> > Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/sched/core.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > index 7f2cae4..e00b8ea 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > @@ -6229,10 +6229,10 @@ static void set_domain_attribute(struct sched_domain *sd,
> > request = attr->relax_domain_level;
> > if (request < sd->level) {
> > /* turn off idle balance on this domain */
> > - sd->flags &= ~(SD_BALANCE_WAKE|SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE);
> > + sd->flags &= ~(SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE);
> > } else {
> > /* turn on idle balance on this domain */
> > - sd->flags |= (SD_BALANCE_WAKE|SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE);
> > + sd->flags |= (SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 1.7.9.5
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists