[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160601025236.GG461@swordfish>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 12:17:35 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] zram: use crypto api to check alg availability
On (06/01/16 11:27), Minchan Kim wrote:
[..]
> > > So, if we do 'cat /sys/block/zram0/comp_algorithm", every crypto modules
> > > in the backend array are loaded in memory and not unloaded until admin
> > > executes rmmod? Right?
> >
> > yes, I think so.
>
> It scares me. Common case, except one we choosed, every loaded modules
> will be not used. I think it's really not good. Although the wastage
> might be not big now, it will be heavy as crypto comp modules are
> increased.
well... if you have those modules enabled then you somehow expect
them to be loaded at some point, if not by zram, then by something
else (networking, etc.). /* not speaking of the systems that have
those modules built-in */ I'm not saying that what we have is
optimal, of course, but it's not so senseless at the same time.
> What do you think about it?
I can do something like this:
diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zcomp.c b/drivers/block/zram/zcomp.c
index 1a4bd20..9b704cc 100644
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zcomp.c
+++ b/drivers/block/zram/zcomp.c
@@ -20,10 +20,18 @@
static const char * const backends[] = {
"lzo",
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CRYPTO_LZ4)
"lz4",
+#endif
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEFLATE)
"deflate",
+#endif
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CRYPTO_LZ4HC)
"lz4hc",
+#endif
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CRYPTO_842)
"842",
+#endif
NULL
};
so both BUILTIN and BUILT-AS-A-MODULE cases are handled at compile
time now and we can avoid crypto_has_comp() checks for most of the
comp_algorithm calls, except for the case when someone requests an
out-of-tree module.
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists