[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160601142138.GX26601@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 16:21:38 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 18/18] mm, vmscan: use proper classzone_idx in
should_continue_reclaim()
On Tue 31-05-16 15:08:18, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
[...]
> @@ -2364,11 +2350,12 @@ static inline bool should_continue_reclaim(struct zone *zone,
> }
>
> static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
> - bool is_classzone)
> + int classzone_idx)
> {
> struct reclaim_state *reclaim_state = current->reclaim_state;
> unsigned long nr_reclaimed, nr_scanned;
> bool reclaimable = false;
> + bool is_classzone = (classzone_idx == zone_idx(zone));
>
> do {
> struct mem_cgroup *root = sc->target_mem_cgroup;
> @@ -2450,7 +2437,7 @@ static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
> reclaimable = true;
>
> } while (should_continue_reclaim(zone, sc->nr_reclaimed - nr_reclaimed,
> - sc->nr_scanned - nr_scanned, sc));
> + sc->nr_scanned - nr_scanned, sc, classzone_idx));
>
> return reclaimable;
> }
> @@ -2580,7 +2567,7 @@ static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
> /* need some check for avoid more shrink_zone() */
> }
>
> - shrink_zone(zone, sc, zone_idx(zone) == classzone_idx);
> + shrink_zone(zone, sc, classzone_idx);
this should be is_classzone, right?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists