linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] perf stat: Basic support for TopDown in perf stat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACbG309Waj8Pwh5P-ANexaTqAF4p=Y1uV9Gq504DOQwXSnLh1w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 1 Jun 2016 09:24:33 -0500
From:	Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@...il.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] perf stat: Basic support for TopDown in perf stat

On 24 May 2016 at 14:52, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> index 715a1128daeb..dab184d86816 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> @@ -59,10 +59,13 @@
>  #include "util/thread.h"
>  #include "util/thread_map.h"
>  #include "util/counts.h"
> +#include "util/group.h"
>  #include "util/session.h"
>  #include "util/tool.h"
> +#include "util/group.h"
>  #include "asm/bug.h"

You have included util/group.h twice.  Is this intentional?

> +static int topdown_filter_events(const char **attr, char **str, bool use_group)
> +{
> +       int off = 0;
> +       int i;
> +       int len = 0;
> +       char *s;
> +
> +       for (i = 0; attr[i]; i++) {
> +               if (pmu_have_event("cpu", attr[i])) {
> +                       len += strlen(attr[i]) + 1;
> +                       attr[i - off] = attr[i];
> +               } else
> +                       off++;
> +       }
> +       attr[i - off] = NULL;
> +
> +       *str = malloc(len + 1 + 2);
> +       if (!*str)
> +               return -1;
> +       s = *str;
> +       if (i - off == 0) {
> +               *s = 0;
> +               return 0;
> +       }

I think we are leaking some memory here.  If i == off, then we set
attr[0] = NULL and do not free the memory allocated to str.


> @@ -1909,6 +1982,46 @@ static int add_default_attributes(void)
>                 return 0;
>         }
>
> +       if (topdown_run) {
> +               char *str = NULL;
> +               bool warn = false;
> +
> +               if (stat_config.aggr_mode != AGGR_GLOBAL &&
> +                   stat_config.aggr_mode != AGGR_CORE) {
> +                       pr_err("top down event configuration requires --per-core mode\n");
> +                       return -1;
> +               }
> +               stat_config.aggr_mode = AGGR_CORE;
> +               if (nr_cgroups || !target__has_cpu(&target)) {
> +                       pr_err("top down event configuration requires system-wide mode (-a)\n");
> +                       return -1;
> +               }
> +
> +               if (!force_metric_only)
> +                       metric_only = true;
> +               if (topdown_filter_events(topdown_attrs, &str,
> +                               arch_topdown_check_group(&warn)) < 0) {
> +                       pr_err("Out of memory\n");
> +                       return -1;
> +               }
> +               if (topdown_attrs[0] && str) {
> +                       if (warn)
> +                               arch_topdown_group_warn();
> +                       err = parse_events(evsel_list, str, NULL);
> +                       if (err) {
> +                               fprintf(stderr,
> +                                       "Cannot set up top down events %s: %d\n",
> +                                       str, err);
> +                               free(str);
> +                               return -1;
> +                       }
> +               } else {
> +                       fprintf(stderr, "System does not support topdown\n");
> +                       return -1;
> +               }
> +               free(str);
> +       }
> +

Continuing with my comment from above memory leak, if i == off,
topdown_attrs[0] will be NULL.  So we would enter the else portion
here and return -1.  But we never free the string we allocated in the
function topdown_filter_events().   I think we are leaking some memory
though seems only about 3 bytes.

--
Nilay