[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160601143136.GO22049@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 07:31:36 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@...il.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, acme@...nel.org,
jolsa@...nel.org, Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] perf stat: Basic support for TopDown in perf stat
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 09:24:33AM -0500, Nilay Vaish wrote:
> On 24 May 2016 at 14:52, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> > From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> > index 715a1128daeb..dab184d86816 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> > @@ -59,10 +59,13 @@
> > #include "util/thread.h"
> > #include "util/thread_map.h"
> > #include "util/counts.h"
> > +#include "util/group.h"
> > #include "util/session.h"
> > #include "util/tool.h"
> > +#include "util/group.h"
> > #include "asm/bug.h"
>
> You have included util/group.h twice. Is this intentional?
No was a mistake thanks.
> Continuing with my comment from above memory leak, if i == off,
> topdown_attrs[0] will be NULL. So we would enter the else portion
> here and return -1. But we never free the string we allocated in the
> function topdown_filter_events(). I think we are leaking some memory
> though seems only about 3 bytes.
Right, however the process immediately exits afterwards, so it gets
cleaned up anyways.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
Powered by blists - more mailing lists