lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 1 Jun 2016 15:26:59 +0000
From:	"Huang, Ray" <Ray.Huang@....com>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
CC:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	"linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org>,
	X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Hurwitz, Sherry" <sherry.hurwitz@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (fam15h_power) Disable preemption when reading
 registers



> On Jun 1, 2016, at 9:23 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> 
>> On 06/01/2016 03:04 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
>> 
>> We need to read a bunch of registers on each compute unit and possibly
>> on the current CPU too. Disable preemption around it.
> 
> An explanation would be helpful. Is this a bug fix ? I would like to get
> a confirmation from someone at AMD that this is really necessary.
> 

This change looks good for me. But I am in office this week, I will test it on CZ platform next week.   :-)

Thanks,
Rui

> Thanks,
> Guenter
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
>> Cc: Rui Huang <ray.huang@....com>
>> Cc: Sherry Hurwitz <sherry.hurwitz@....com>
>> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
>> ---
>>  drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c | 10 ++++++----
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c b/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c
>> index eb97a9241d17..69bb810f528b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c
>> @@ -172,9 +172,9 @@ static void do_read_registers_on_cu(void *_data)
>>   */
>>  static int read_registers(struct fam15h_power_data *data)
>>  {
>> -    int this_cpu, ret, cpu;
>>      int core, this_core;
>>      cpumask_var_t mask;
>> +    int ret, cpu;
>> 
>>      ret = zalloc_cpumask_var(&mask, GFP_KERNEL);
>>      if (!ret)
>> @@ -183,7 +183,6 @@ static int read_registers(struct fam15h_power_data *data)
>>      memset(data->cu_on, 0, sizeof(int) * MAX_CUS);
>> 
>>      get_online_cpus();
>> -    this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
>> 
>>      /*
>>       * Choose the first online core of each compute unit, and then
>> @@ -205,10 +204,13 @@ static int read_registers(struct fam15h_power_data *data)
>>          cpumask_set_cpu(cpumask_any(topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu)), mask);
>>      }
>> 
>> -    if (cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu, mask))
>> +    preempt_disable();
>> +    smp_call_function_many(mask, do_read_registers_on_cu, data, true);
>> +
>> +    if (cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), mask))
>>          do_read_registers_on_cu(data);
>> 
>> -    smp_call_function_many(mask, do_read_registers_on_cu, data, true);
>> +    preempt_enable();
>>      put_online_cpus();
>> 
>>      free_cpumask_var(mask);
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ