[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f7f5d241-5bdc-284e-2042-ea1905e30e2f@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 20:37:34 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>,
rkrcmar@...hat.com, joro@...tes.org, bp@...en8.de, gleb@...nel.org,
alex.williamson@...hat.com
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wei@...hat.com,
sherry.hurwitz@....com
Subject: Re: [PART1 V5 13/13] svm: Manage vcpu load/unload when enable AVIC
On 01/06/2016 20:18, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
>>>
>>> + svm->avic_is_running = is_run;
>
> Shouldn't we do this below --->
>>>
>>> /* ID = 0xff (broadcast), ID > 0xff (reserved) */
>>> - if (h_physical_id >= AVIC_MAX_PHYSICAL_ID_COUNT)
>>> - return -EINVAL;
>>> + if (WARN_ON(h_physical_id >= AVIC_MAX_PHYSICAL_ID_COUNT))
>>> + return;
>
> <--- HERE
It doesn't really matter because these physical APIC IDs are not
reachable anyway so they don't have the IS_RUNNING field.
The avic_is_running field is only used in avic_vcpu_load, and again only
when h_physical_id is in range. I left the assignment before the
warning so that avic_vcpu_load does the right thing after a
(hypothetical) migration from an out-of-range physical CPU to an
in-range physical CPU.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists