[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160602065715.GA10803@pd.tnic>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 08:57:15 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org, dvhart@...radead.org,
dougthompson@...ssion.com, edubezval@...il.com, hpa@...or.com,
mingo@...hat.com, jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com,
kan.liang@...el.com, lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, mchehab@....samsung.com,
peterz@...radead.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, rajneesh.bhardwaj@...el.com,
souvik.k.chakravarty@...el.com,
srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com, eranian@...gle.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, tony.luck@...el.com, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, vishwanath.somayaji@...el.com,
zheng.z.yan@...el.com, rui.zhang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/20] x86, intel: Introduce macros for Intel family
numbers
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 05:11:57PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> +#define INTEL_FAM6_MODEL_CORE_YONAH 0x0E
> +#define INTEL_FAM6_MODEL_CORE2_MEROM 0x0F
That "MODEL_" part looks redundant too IMO - you could simply do
INTEL_FAM6_NEHALEM and
INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_DESKTOP
...
and so on and it is still clear what it is.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists