[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4e72ae37-a018-a17d-6a58-8450db58d1c7@broadcom.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 09:25:17 -0700
From: Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>, Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"open list:BROADCOM BCM281XX/BCM11XXX/BCM216XX ARM ARCHITE..."
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
"moderated list:ARM SUB-ARCHITECTURES"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/32] arm64: Add platform selection for BCM2835.
On 6/1/2016 11:45 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>>> config ARCH_BCM2835
>>> bool "Broadcom BCM2835 family"
>>> - depends on ARCH_MULTI_V6 || ARCH_MULTI_V7
>>> + depends on ARCH_MULTI_V6 || ARCH_MULTI_V7 || ARM64
>>
>> Humm, what does that achieve?
>
> Nothing ;)
>
> Slipped through unnoticed, I'll drop it.
>
>>> +config ARCH_BCM
>>> + bool "Broadcom SoC Support"
>>> + help
>>> + This enables support for Broadcom ARM based SoC chips
>>
>> menuconfig maybe?
>
> There isn't any in arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms right now, so I didn't
> feel like introducing one. Also the dependency should have pretty much
> the same effect ...
>
>>> +config ARCH_BCM2835
>>> + bool "Broadcom BCM2835 family"
>>> + depends on ARCH_BCM
>>> + select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
>>> + select CLKSRC_OF
>>> + select PINCTRL
>>> + select PINCTRL_BCM2835
>>> + select ARM_AMBA
>>> + select ARM_TIMER_SP804
>>> + select HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
>>> + help
>>> + This enables support for the Broadcom BCM2837 SoC.
>>> + This SoC is used in the Raspberry Pi 3 device.
>>> +
>>> config ARCH_BCM_IPROC
>>> bool "Broadcom iProc SoC Family"
>>> + depends on ARCH_BCM
>>
>> Does not seem necessary nor adding anything here.
>
> Added for consistency. When we add ARCH_BCM all ARCH_BCM_* should
> depend on it ...
>
> We could also do it the other way around: make ARCH_BCM a hidden bool
> and have ARCH_BCM_* select it.
Yes, this is probably better.
ARCH_BCM_IPROC is currently enabled in arch/arm64/configs/defconfig. By
adding a dependency here without enabling ARCH_BCM in arm64 defconfig,
this effectively disables ARCH_BCM_IPROC from arm64 defconfig.
>
> cheers,
> Gerd
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists