[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160603075435.GA30149@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 15:54:35 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
"open list:DEVICE-MAPPER (LVM)" <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@...il.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>, tadeusz.struk@...el.com,
smueller@...onox.de, Masanari Iida <standby24x7@...il.com>,
Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagig@...lanox.com>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
"open list:SOFTWARE RAID (Multiple Disks) SUPPORT"
<linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 2/3] crypto: Introduce CRYPTO_ALG_BULK flag
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 03:10:31PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> On 3 June 2016 at 14:51, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 02:48:34PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> >>
> >> If we move the IV generation into the crypto API, we also can not
> >> handle every algorithm with the bulk interface. Cause we also need to
> >> use different methods to map one whole bio or map one sector according
> >> to the algorithm whether can support bulk mode or not. Please correct
> >> me if I misunderstand your points. Thanks.
> >
> > Which ones can't be handled this way?
>
> What I mean is bulk mode and sector mode's difference is not only the
> IV handling method, but also the method to map the data with
> scatterlists.
> Then we have two processes in dm-crypt ( crypt_convert_block() and
> crypt_convert_bulk_block() ) to handle the data, so we can not handle
> every algorithm with the bulk interface.
As I asked, which algorithm can't you handle through the bulk
interface, assuming it did all the requisite magic to generate
the correct IV?
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists