[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <575145AB.7030703@rock-chips.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2016 16:54:03 +0800
From: Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>
To: Javi Merino <javi.merino@....com>
CC: Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>, huangtao@...k-chips.com,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Ni Wade <wni@...dia.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, peter@...e.net, dianders@...omium.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, edubezval@...il.com,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>, smbarber@...gle.com,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>, cf@...k-chips.com,
briannorris@...gle.com, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Andy Champ <andycham@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v4 1/5] thermal: Add support for hardware-tracked
trip points
Javi,
Thanks your comments.
On 2016年06月03日 01:30, Javi Merino wrote:
> Hi Caesar,
>
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 04:36:44PM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote:
>> From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
>>
>> This adds support for hardware-tracked trip points to the device tree
>> thermal sensor framework.
>>
>> The framework supports an arbitrary number of trip points. Whenever
>> the current temperature is updated, the trip points immediately
>> below and above the current temperature are found. A .set_trips
>> callback is then called with the temperatures. If there is no trip
>> point above or below the current temperature, the passed trip
>> temperature will be -INT_MAX or INT_MAX respectively. In this callback,
>> the driver should program the hardware such that it is notified
>> when either of these trip points are triggered. When a trip point
>> is triggered, the driver should call `thermal_zone_device_update'
>> for the respective thermal zone. This will cause the trip points
>> to be updated again.
>>
>> If .set_trips is not implemented, the framework behaves as before.
>>
>> This patch is based on an earlier version from Mikko Perttunen
>> <mikko.perttunen@...si.fi>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>
>> Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
>> Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
>> Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v4:
>> - Missing the lock added in v3.
>>
>> Changes in v3:
>> - as Javi comments on https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9001281/.
>> - add the lock for preventing the called from multi placce
>> - add the note for pre_low/high_trip.
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - update the sysfs-api.txt for set_trips.
>>
>> Documentation/thermal/sysfs-api.txt | 7 +++++
>> drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/thermal.h | 7 +++++
>> 3 files changed, 70 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/thermal/sysfs-api.txt b/Documentation/thermal/sysfs-api.txt
>> index efc3f3d..75d8838 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/thermal/sysfs-api.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/thermal/sysfs-api.txt
>> @@ -49,6 +49,9 @@ temperature) and throttle appropriate devices.
>> .bind: bind the thermal zone device with a thermal cooling device.
>> .unbind: unbind the thermal zone device with a thermal cooling device.
>> .get_temp: get the current temperature of the thermal zone.
>> + .set_trips: set the trip points window. Whenever the current temperature
>> + is updated, the trip points immediately below and above the
>> + current temperature are found.
>> .get_mode: get the current mode (enabled/disabled) of the thermal zone.
>> - "enabled" means the kernel thermal management is enabled.
>> - "disabled" will prevent kernel thermal driver action upon trip points
>> @@ -95,6 +98,10 @@ temperature) and throttle appropriate devices.
>> get_temp: a pointer to a function that reads the
>> sensor temperature. This is mandatory
>> callback provided by sensor driver.
>> + set_trips: a pointer to a function that sets a
>> + temperature window. When this window is
>> + left the driver must inform the thermal
>> + core via thermal_zone_device_update.
>> get_trend: a pointer to a function that reads the
>> sensor temperature trend.
>> set_emul_temp: a pointer to a function that sets
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
>> index 5133cd1..0591438 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
>> @@ -520,6 +520,55 @@ exit:
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(thermal_zone_get_temp);
>>
>> +static void thermal_zone_set_trips(struct thermal_zone_device *tz)
>> +{
>> + int low = -INT_MAX;
>> + int high = INT_MAX;
>> + int trip_temp, hysteresis;
>> + int temp = tz->temperature;
>> + int i, ret;
>> +
>> + if (!tz->ops->set_trips)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < tz->trips; i++) {
>> + int trip_low;
>> +
>> + tz->ops->get_trip_temp(tz, i, &trip_temp);
>> + tz->ops->get_trip_hyst(tz, i, &hysteresis);
>> +
>> + trip_low = trip_temp - hysteresis;
> You only use the hysteresis for the low trip point and not for the
> high trip point. Shouldn't you also add:
>
> trip_high = trip_temp + hysteresis;
>
> ...
I don't think so, I think we didn't need add the for trip_high.
We should triggle the trip points () in time when passive cooling,
and throttle the frequency with the related governor. (After all that's
used for high temperature)
---
Maybe, we should think about the low temperature for thermal. (e.g. -10
degree, -20 degree....)
The rockchip some SoCs have the hardware low temperature interrupts for
thermal,
but I haven't got up it.
>
>> +
>> + if (trip_low < temp && trip_low > low)
>> + low = trip_low;
>> +
>> + if (trip_temp > temp && trip_temp < high)
>> + high = trip_temp;
> ... and here:
>
> if (trip_high > temp && trip_high < high)
> high = trip_high;
Ditto
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* No need to change trip points */
>> + if (tz->prev_low_trip == low && tz->prev_high_trip == high)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&tz->lock);
> I think you should get the lock for the whole function, including the
> read of tz->temperature . I know I said that the lock should be
> acquired before the if condition before but thinking about it, I think
> there may be a race condition if userspace updates the hysteresis
> while thermal_zone_device_update() is updating the temperature: you
> could have the cpu that is updating the hysteresis seeing the old
> temperature while the cpu that is updating the temperature would see
> the old hysteresis. I think it's safer if this whole function is
> protected from the lock, from the read of tz->temperature until the
> end.
Okay, I agree with you in here. :)
Thanks.
-
Caesar
>
> Cheers,
> Javi
>
>> +
>> + tz->prev_low_trip = low;
>> + tz->prev_high_trip = high;
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(&tz->device, "new temperature boundaries: %d < x < %d\n",
>> + low, high);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Set a temperature window. When this window is left the driver
>> + * must inform the thermal core via thermal_zone_device_update.
>> + */
>> + ret = tz->ops->set_trips(tz, low, high);
>> + if (ret)
>> + dev_err(&tz->device, "Failed to set trips: %d\n", ret);
>> +
>> + mutex_unlock(&tz->lock);
>> +}
>> +
>> static void update_temperature(struct thermal_zone_device *tz)
>> {
>> int temp, ret;
>> @@ -569,6 +618,8 @@ void thermal_zone_device_update(struct thermal_zone_device *tz)
>>
>> update_temperature(tz);
>>
>> + thermal_zone_set_trips(tz);
>> +
>> for (count = 0; count < tz->trips; count++)
>> handle_thermal_trip(tz, count);
>> }
>> @@ -754,6 +805,9 @@ trip_point_hyst_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>> */
>> ret = tz->ops->set_trip_hyst(tz, trip, temperature);
>>
>> + if (!ret)
>> + thermal_zone_set_trips(tz);
>> +
>> return ret ? ret : count;
>> }
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-rockchip mailing list
> Linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
--
caesar wang | software engineer | wxt@...k-chip.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists