linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] pci: Add PCIe driver for Rockchip Soc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160603085547.GB24547@red-moon>
Date:	Fri, 3 Jun 2016 09:55:47 +0100
From:	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To:	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Cc:	Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	Wenrui Li <wenrui.li@...k-chips.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pci: Add PCIe driver for Rockchip Soc

On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 01:25:14PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:

[...]

> > +	} else {
> > +		bus = pci_scan_root_bus(&pdev->dev, 0,
> > +					&rockchip_pcie_ops, port, &res);
> > +	}
> > +	if (!bus)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	if (!pci_has_flag(PCI_PROBE_ONLY)) {
> 
> Why do you have catter for the PCI_PROBE_ONLY case? Nobody should ever
> use that for properly implemented HW.

I think that's just copy and paste and it is a useless check given
that the only way we can set that flag on ARM/ARM64 is through DT
(of_pci_check_probe_only()) and I doubt that systems probing this
driver really require a PCI_PROBE_ONLY set-up.

So, unless you can explain to us why it is really needed, please
remove the:

if (!pci_has_flag(PCI_PROBE_ONLY))

check.

Lorenzo