[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160603130512.GF9912@griffinp-ThinkPad-X1-Carbon-2nd>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 14:05:12 +0100
From: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
srinivas.kandagatla@...il.com, maxime.coquelin@...com,
patrice.chotard@...com, vinod.koul@...el.com, ohad@...ery.com,
bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, arnd@...db.de, lee.jones@...aro.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, arnaud.pouliquen@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/18] ASoC: sti: Update DT example to match the
driver code
Hi Mark,
On Fri, 27 May 2016, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 05:06:44PM +0100, Peter Griffin wrote:
> > uniperiph-id, version and mode are ST specific bindings and
> > need the 'st,' prefix. Update the examples, as otherwise copying
> > them yields a runtime error parsing the DT node.
>
> You've not copied me on the rest of the series so I've no idea what's
> going on with dependencies. When sending a patch series it is important
> to ensure that all the various maintainers understand what the
> relationship between the patches as the expecation is that there will be
> interdependencies. Either copy everyone on the whole series or at least
> copy them on the cover letter and explain what's going on. If there are
> no strong interdependencies then it's generally simplest to just send
> the patches separately to avoid any possible confusion.
Ok will bare this in mind for v5 series.
Regards,
Peter.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists