[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1465226609.25087.10.camel@perches.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 08:23:29 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jyoti Singh <jssengar92@...il.com>
Cc: arnd@...db.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jyoti Singh <jssengar@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] char: Prefer pr_* instead of printk
On Sat, 2016-06-04 at 09:36 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 08:15:11PM +0530, Jyoti Singh wrote:
> >
> > This patch replaces all the printk[KERN_INFO] with pr_* in the file
> > "ttyprintk.c" addressing the following warning:
> >
> > WARNING:Prefer [subsystem eg: netdev]_info([subsystem]dev, ...
> > then dev_info(dev,... then pr_info(... to printk(KERN_INFO ...
> > Found with checkpatch
> Sometimes checkpatch tells you to do things that are incorrect :)
>
> Are you _sure_ the code works the same before and after this? The
> ttyprintk driver is a bit "special".
when pr_fmt is not defined (and ttyprint doesn't use pr_fmt),
pr_<level> uses are printks.
#define pr_info(fmt, ...) \
printk(KERN_INFO pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
The only one that is not a printk is pr_debug.
It'd be simpler code if all the printks in this file were
consolidated into something like a single tpk_flush function
and the tpk_tag removed.
Something like (completely untested, just typed and compiled
with a couple typos fixed)
---
drivers/char/ttyprintk.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/ttyprintk.c b/drivers/char/ttyprintk.c
index b098d2d..67549ce 100644
--- a/drivers/char/ttyprintk.c
+++ b/drivers/char/ttyprintk.c
@@ -31,60 +31,53 @@ static struct ttyprintk_port tpk_port;
* printk messages (also suitable for logging service):
* - any cr is replaced by nl
* - adds a ttyprintk source tag in front of each line
- * - too long message is fragmeted, with '\'nl between fragments
- * - TPK_STR_SIZE isn't really the write_room limiting factor, bcause
+ * - too long message is fragmented, with '\'nl between fragments
+ * - TPK_STR_SIZE isn't really the write_room limiting factor, because
* it is emptied on the fly during preformatting.
*/
#define TPK_STR_SIZE 508 /* should be bigger then max expected line length */
#define TPK_MAX_ROOM 4096 /* we could assume 4K for instance */
-static const char *tpk_tag = "[U] "; /* U for User */
static int tpk_curr;
+static char tpk_buffer[TPK_STR_SIZE + 4];
+
+static void tpk_flush(void)
+{
+ if (tpk_curr > 0) {
+ tpk_buffer[tpk_curr] = '\0';
+ pr_info("[U] %s\n", tpk_buffer);
+ tpk_curr = 0;
+ }
+}
+
static int tpk_printk(const unsigned char *buf, int count)
{
- static char tmp[TPK_STR_SIZE + 4];
int i = tpk_curr;
if (buf == NULL) {
- /* flush tmp[] */
- if (tpk_curr > 0) {
- /* non nl or cr terminated message - add nl */
- tmp[tpk_curr + 0] = '\n';
- tmp[tpk_curr + 1] = '\0';
- printk(KERN_INFO "%s%s", tpk_tag, tmp);
- tpk_curr = 0;
- }
+ tpk_flush();
return i;
}
for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
- tmp[tpk_curr] = buf[i];
- if (tpk_curr < TPK_STR_SIZE) {
- switch (buf[i]) {
- case '\r':
- /* replace cr with nl */
- tmp[tpk_curr + 0] = '\n';
- tmp[tpk_curr + 1] = '\0';
- printk(KERN_INFO "%s%s", tpk_tag, tmp);
- tpk_curr = 0;
- if ((i + 1) < count && buf[i + 1] == '\n')
- i++;
- break;
- case '\n':
- tmp[tpk_curr + 1] = '\0';
- printk(KERN_INFO "%s%s", tpk_tag, tmp);
- tpk_curr = 0;
- break;
- default:
- tpk_curr++;
- }
- } else {
+ if (tpk_curr >= TPK_STR_SIZE) {
/* end of tmp buffer reached: cut the message in two */
- tmp[tpk_curr + 1] = '\\';
- tmp[tpk_curr + 2] = '\n';
- tmp[tpk_curr + 3] = '\0';
- printk(KERN_INFO "%s%s", tpk_tag, tmp);
- tpk_curr = 0;
+ tpk_buffer[tpk_curr++] = '\\';
+ tpk_flush();
+ }
+
+ switch (buf[i]) {
+ case '\r':
+ tpk_flush();
+ if ((i + 1) < count && buf[i + 1] == '\n')
+ i++;
+ break;
+ case '\n':
+ tpk_flush();
+ break;
+ default:
+ tpk_buffer[tpk_curr++] = buf[i];
+ break;
}
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists