[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6f15f27f-3757-5413-4292-1386e95bc278@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 17:05:05 -0300
From: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <daolivei@...hat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
"Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lgoncalv@...hat.com>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cgroup: disable irqs while holding css_set_lock
On 06/07/2016 04:30 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Is this something in mainline? This forces all task free path to be
> irq-safe, which *could* be fine but it's weird to make cgroup free
> path irq-safe for something which isn't in mainline.
you mean, mainline linux kernel? if so, yes it is. I was running the
v4.7-rc2 from Linus, as is.... no external patches applied.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists