[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <38469b61-7cc5-5fec-4de3-0e9a616dfe95@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:48:56 -0300
From: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <daolivei@...hat.com>
To: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <daolivei@...hat.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
"Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lgoncalv@...hat.com>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cgroup: disable irqs while holding css_set_lock
On 06/07/2016 05:05 PM, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:
> On 06/07/2016 04:30 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Is this something in mainline? This forces all task free path to be
>> irq-safe, which *could* be fine but it's weird to make cgroup free
>> path irq-safe for something which isn't in mainline.
>
> you mean, mainline linux kernel? if so, yes it is. I was running the
> v4.7-rc2 from Linus, as is.... no external patches applied.
>
is there any other question/objection about this patch?
-- Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists