[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160607161508.GC7510@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 17:15:08 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Garlic Tseng <garlic.tseng@...iatek.com>
Cc: tiwai@...e.de, srv_heupstream@...iatek.com,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, koro.chen@...iatek.com,
PC.Liao@...iatek.com, ir.lian@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v2 5/9] ASoC: mediatek: add structure define
and clock control for 2701
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 12:56:20PM +0800, Garlic Tseng wrote:
> +void mt2701_init_clock(struct mtk_base_afe *afe)
> +{
> + struct mt2701_afe_private *afe_priv = afe->platform_priv;
> + int i = 0;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < MT2701_CLOCK_NUM; i++) {
> + afe_priv->clocks[i] = devm_clk_get(afe->dev, aud_clks[i]);
> + if (IS_ERR(aud_clks[i]))
> + dev_warn(afe->dev, "%s devm_clk_get %s fail\n",
> + __func__, aud_clks[i]);
> + }
> +}
This looks like we just ignore the error but I'm not seeing anything
that stops us trying to use the clocks or handle deferred probe?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists