[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160608190529.GA26925@obsidianresearch.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 13:05:29 -0600
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
To: Ed Swierk <eswierk@...portsystems.com>
Cc: tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH v4 3/4] tpm: Allow TPM chip drivers to
override reported command durations
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 05:45:39PM -0700, Ed Swierk wrote:
> + case 0x32041114: /* Atmel 3204 */
> + chip->vendor.timeout_a = TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT * HZ / 1000;
> + chip->vendor.timeout_b = TIS_LONG_TIMEOUT * HZ / 1000;
> + chip->vendor.timeout_c = TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT * HZ / 1000;
> + chip->vendor.timeout_d = TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT * HZ / 1000;
Shouldn't these use msec_to_jiffies?
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists