[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAO_EM_nY3X310xLtf6njsgmeaJuB2t=FcU9Gh=cMK0o55a=WXw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 13:41:41 -0700
From: Ed Swierk <eswierk@...portsystems.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
Cc: tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH v4 3/4] tpm: Allow TPM chip drivers to
override reported command durations
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Jason Gunthorpe
<jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 05:45:39PM -0700, Ed Swierk wrote:
>> + case 0x32041114: /* Atmel 3204 */
>> + chip->vendor.timeout_a = TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT * HZ / 1000;
>> + chip->vendor.timeout_b = TIS_LONG_TIMEOUT * HZ / 1000;
>> + chip->vendor.timeout_c = TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT * HZ / 1000;
>> + chip->vendor.timeout_d = TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT * HZ / 1000;
>
> Shouldn't these use msec_to_jiffies?
Indeed * HZ / 1000 can be one jiffy less than msec_to_jiffies(),
depending on HZ. I'll change it.
--Ed
Powered by blists - more mailing lists