linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] watchdog: add watchdog pretimeout framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160608075619.GF1521@katana>
Date:	Wed, 8 Jun 2016 09:56:19 +0200
From:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:	Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@...tor.com>
Cc:	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Robin Gong <b38343@...escale.com>,
	linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] watchdog: add watchdog pretimeout framework

> Changes from v2 to v3:

This series was odd to review. I am used to that we build stuff on top
of each other to strive for the best technical solution. I didn't expect
that you like all of my changes, but at least some of them were obviously
correct. But since even those were ignored, it really feels like a step
backwards and thus, the reviewing time a bit wasted :(

Stuff like 64-bit support and the softdog timer (so people can actually
test the framework) is completely missing, too. Why not adding those?
They are easy patches.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)