[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5758167C.9080301@mentor.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 15:58:36 +0300
From: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@...tor.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
CC: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Robin Gong <b38343@...escale.com>,
<linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] watchdog: add set_pretimeout interface
Hi Wolfram,
On 08.06.2016 09:34, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 08:38:42PM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> From: Robin Gong <b38343@...escale.com>
>>
>> Add set_pretimeout since our watchdog driver has those interfaces and
>> obviously, the new common watchdog framework didn't implement this
>> interface.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robin Gong <b38343@...escale.com>
>> [vzapolskiy: rebased, added an inline comment to describe new interface]
>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@...tor.com>
>
> Why didn't you just take my patch and worked on it? This would have
> added the documentation Guenter explicitly requested when reviewing
> Robin's patch. And it would have get rid of the bug you have in the
> *_invalid function. I also don't think the split-up into three patches
> is necessary here, but that might just be me.
>
I agree, your version is obviously more advanced, I will take it for v4.
Best wishes,
Vladimir
Powered by blists - more mailing lists