[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <990829a2-036a-c1c7-35ac-d5dfecaa7b0d@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 02:43:14 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] x86, asm: use bool for bitops and other assembly
outputs
On 06/08/16 02:39, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> So I think using bool as return type or argument is fine, using it in
> structures is 'insane'.
>
Yes, scalar use only, and not across the kernel boundary, please.
-hpa
Powered by blists - more mailing lists