[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160608124312.GA30927@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 14:43:12 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
Cc: "torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>,
"paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"boqun.feng@...il.com" <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
"waiman.long@....com" <waiman.long@....com>,
"fweisbec@...il.com" <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"rth@...ddle.net" <rth@...ddle.net>,
"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"egtvedt@...fundet.no" <egtvedt@...fundet.no>,
"realmz6@...il.com" <realmz6@...il.com>,
"ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp" <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
"rkuo@...eaurora.org" <rkuo@...eaurora.org>,
"tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"geert@...ux-m68k.org" <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
"james.hogan@...tec.com" <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
"ralf@...ux-mips.org" <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
"dhowells@...hat.com" <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"jejb@...isc-linux.org" <jejb@...isc-linux.org>,
"mpe@...erman.id.au" <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
"schwidefsky@...ibm.com" <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
"dalias@...c.org" <dalias@...c.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"cmetcalf@...lanox.com" <cmetcalf@...lanox.com>,
"jcmvbkbc@...il.com" <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>, "dbueso@...e.de" <dbueso@...e.de>,
"fengguang.wu@...el.com" <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 00/33] implement atomic_fetch_$op
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 11:33:04AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 09:27:36AM +0000, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> > What's ur merge plan - are u going to rebase/respin once more so I can push those
> > updates to Linus for 4.7-rc2. Or you could carry those ARC patches in ur tree -
> > ahead of ur series. I'd much rather prefer the revert / cleanup before adding new
> > code which extends the back off code only to be deleted later.
>
> I was hoping to get these into tip for v4.8, I can rebase on whatever
> changes you make in v4.7 no problem.
-rc2 seems to have happened and I cannot seem to find changes to
arc/atomic.h, will you still be pushing those patches this window or
should I queue my patches?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists