linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 08/14] usb: otg: add OTG/dual-role core

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160608124204.GB10029@shlinux2>
Date:	Wed, 8 Jun 2016 20:42:04 +0800
From:	Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@...il.com>
To:	Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
Cc:	peter.chen@...escale.com, balbi@...nel.org, tony@...mide.com,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
	mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com, Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com,
	sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com, jun.li@...escale.com,
	grygorii.strashko@...com, yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com,
	robh@...nel.org, nsekhar@...com, b-liu@...com,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 08/14] usb: otg: add OTG/dual-role core

On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 01:12:10PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 08/06/16 12:53, Peter Chen wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 12:03:40PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >> +int usb_otg_unregister(struct device *dev)
> >> +{
> >> +	struct usb_otg *otg;
> >> +
> >> +	mutex_lock(&otg_list_mutex);
> >> +	otg = usb_otg_get_data(dev);
> >> +	if (!otg) {
> >> +		dev_err(dev, "otg: %s: device not in otg list\n",
> >> +			__func__);
> >> +		mutex_unlock(&otg_list_mutex);
> >> +		return -EINVAL;
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >> +	/* prevent unregister till both host & gadget have unregistered */
> >> +	if (otg->host || otg->gadget) {
> >> +		dev_err(dev, "otg: %s: host/gadget still registered\n",
> >> +			__func__);
> > 
> > You need to call mutex_unlock here
> 
> Indeed. good catch.
> > 
> >> +
> >> +int usb_otg_gadget_ready(struct usb_gadget *gadget, bool ready)
> >> +{
> > 
> > What this API is for? Why need it in this version?
> 
> we moved gadget to otg registration from udc_bind_to_driver() to usb_add_gadget_udc_release().
> This means there is a window when gadget function driver (e.g. g_zero) is not loaded.
> We don't want to start the gadget controller in that window.
> 
> usb_otg_gadget_ready() is used by gadget core to notify the otg core when the function driver
> is ready or not-ready.
> 

Why you need to move this from gadget's probe to udc's probe? Currently,
the sequence of gadget and udc's probe is random, but udc_bind_to_driver
is called when udc is ready.

-- 

Best Regards,
Peter Chen