[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-bf7b4c472db44413251bcef79ca1f6bf1ec81475@git.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 07:25:55 -0700
From: tip-bot for Waiman Long <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: doug.hatch@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jason.low2@...com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Waiman.Long@....com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, scott.norton@....com,
david@...morbit.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, dave@...olabs.net,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, peter@...leysoftware.com,
hpa@...or.com
Subject: [tip:locking/core] locking/rwsem: Improve reader wakeup code
Commit-ID: bf7b4c472db44413251bcef79ca1f6bf1ec81475
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/bf7b4c472db44413251bcef79ca1f6bf1ec81475
Author: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@....com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 17 May 2016 21:26:22 -0400
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 15:17:00 +0200
locking/rwsem: Improve reader wakeup code
In __rwsem_do_wake(), the reader wakeup code will assume a writer
has stolen the lock if the active reader/writer count is not 0.
However, this is not as reliable an indicator as the original
"< RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS" check. If another reader is present, the code
will still break out and exit even if the writer is gone. This patch
changes it to check the same "< RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS" condition to
reduce the chance of false positive.
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@....com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Cc: Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@....com>
Cc: Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Scott J Norton <scott.norton@....com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1463534783-38814-5-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c | 11 ++++++++---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
index 6b0d060..4f1daf5 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
@@ -156,9 +156,14 @@ __rwsem_mark_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
oldcount = atomic_long_add_return(adjustment, &sem->count) - adjustment;
if (unlikely(oldcount < RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS)) {
- /* A writer stole the lock. Undo our reader grant. */
- if (atomic_long_sub_return(adjustment, &sem->count) &
- RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK)
+ /*
+ * If the count is still less than RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS
+ * after removing the adjustment, it is assumed that
+ * a writer has stolen the lock. We have to undo our
+ * reader grant.
+ */
+ if (atomic_long_add_return(-adjustment, &sem->count) <
+ RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS)
goto out;
/* Last active locker left. Retry waking readers. */
goto try_reader_grant;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists