[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-ddd0fa73c2b71c35de4fe7ae60a5f1a6cddc2cf0@git.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 07:26:21 -0700
From: tip-bot for Waiman Long <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: scott.norton@....com, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
david@...morbit.com, jason.low2@...com, dave@...olabs.net,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, doug.hatch@....com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@...radead.org,
Waiman.Long@....com, peter@...leysoftware.com, mingo@...nel.org
Subject: [tip:locking/core] locking/rwsem: Streamline the
rwsem_optimistic_spin() code
Commit-ID: ddd0fa73c2b71c35de4fe7ae60a5f1a6cddc2cf0
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/ddd0fa73c2b71c35de4fe7ae60a5f1a6cddc2cf0
Author: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@....com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 17 May 2016 21:26:23 -0400
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 15:17:00 +0200
locking/rwsem: Streamline the rwsem_optimistic_spin() code
This patch moves the owner loading and checking code entirely inside of
rwsem_spin_on_owner() to simplify the logic of rwsem_optimistic_spin()
loop.
Suggested-by: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@....com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Cc: Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@....com>
Cc: Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Scott J Norton <scott.norton@....com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1463534783-38814-6-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
index 4f1daf5..2031281 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
@@ -350,9 +350,16 @@ done:
return ret;
}
-static noinline
-bool rwsem_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem, struct task_struct *owner)
+/*
+ * Return true only if we can still spin on the owner field of the rwsem.
+ */
+static noinline bool rwsem_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
+ struct task_struct *owner = READ_ONCE(sem->owner);
+
+ if (!rwsem_owner_is_writer(owner))
+ goto out;
+
rcu_read_lock();
while (sem->owner == owner) {
/*
@@ -372,7 +379,7 @@ bool rwsem_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem, struct task_struct *owner)
cpu_relax_lowlatency();
}
rcu_read_unlock();
-
+out:
/*
* If there is a new owner or the owner is not set, we continue
* spinning.
@@ -382,7 +389,6 @@ bool rwsem_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem, struct task_struct *owner)
static bool rwsem_optimistic_spin(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
- struct task_struct *owner;
bool taken = false;
preempt_disable();
@@ -394,21 +400,17 @@ static bool rwsem_optimistic_spin(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
if (!osq_lock(&sem->osq))
goto done;
- while (true) {
- owner = READ_ONCE(sem->owner);
+ /*
+ * Optimistically spin on the owner field and attempt to acquire the
+ * lock whenever the owner changes. Spinning will be stopped when:
+ * 1) the owning writer isn't running; or
+ * 2) readers own the lock as we can't determine if they are
+ * actively running or not.
+ */
+ while (rwsem_spin_on_owner(sem)) {
/*
- * Don't spin if
- * 1) the owner is a reader as we we can't determine if the
- * reader is actively running or not.
- * 2) The rwsem_spin_on_owner() returns false which means
- * the owner isn't running.
+ * Try to acquire the lock
*/
- if (rwsem_owner_is_reader(owner) ||
- (rwsem_owner_is_writer(owner) &&
- !rwsem_spin_on_owner(sem, owner)))
- break;
-
- /* wait_lock will be acquired if write_lock is obtained */
if (rwsem_try_write_lock_unqueued(sem)) {
taken = true;
break;
@@ -420,7 +422,7 @@ static bool rwsem_optimistic_spin(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
* we're an RT task that will live-lock because we won't let
* the owner complete.
*/
- if (!owner && (need_resched() || rt_task(current)))
+ if (!sem->owner && (need_resched() || rt_task(current)))
break;
/*
Powered by blists - more mailing lists